Everyone wants to connect an AI assistant to the marketing stack. You are the one who has to decide whether that is safe. In Marqeable, assistants read everything and write only drafts. A person reviews and launches.
The path is the same whether a person or an agent started the draft. Approval is a state on the piece, not a thread in a chat tool.
Quiet hours are 7 AM to 9 PM in the recipient timezone. Opt-out replies are handled in the send path, not by a person remembering to check.
Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex connect with a per-user sign-in. They read your brand, calendar, campaigns, and content, and they write drafts. They cannot send, launch, or delete.
The marketing calendar holds launches, events, offers, and dates. Every piece moves from draft to Ready in the same way, so you can see what is waiting and on whom.
Automations get a dry run before they go live, and can be paused and edited after. Contacts and lifecycle data come from the CRM you already run.
Connect Marqeable to the assistant you already use. It reads your real brand, offer, calendar, and live automations, then writes the draft into Marqeable. Nothing sends until you say so.
get_automation_overviewget_automation_plancheck_automation_readinessget_content_calendarEvery write is a draft. No send, launch, or delete tools.
Nothing on this page sends without your approval. Email replies are always drafted, never sent for you. See every use case
One system instead of five tools and a spreadsheet, and the questions ops should ask first.
Read articleJudge a connector by its tool list, and adopt the draft-only rule.
Read articleWhich actions AI can take alone, which need an approval workflow, and which should stay human.
Read articleAssistants draft, people approve, and Marqeable runs the send. Private beta, small early cohort, hands-on onboarding.